Strategy #14 : Contests and Giveaways

Priority: Low Time Required: Less than an hour, provided you have a content marketing plan

تحميل كتاب 1000 كلمة إنجليزية مستخدمة في حياتنا اليومية  😍 
اضغط الرابط اسفله






oad of social media followers and email subscribers. You can approach blogs in your niche to see if they are willing to host giveaways. In this case, it’s always best to only target those blogs that have a decent following. You can check up on this using either their social media profiles or the number of comments they receive as a gauge. The rules for entering a contest could be to sign up for your email list or follow you on social profiles, or a combination of those. Be careful, though - once you run the contest, you will find yourself with a giant social following and a huge email list - both of which may go to waste if you don’t have some content ready for them to consume! Quick Tip: If you sell something really expensive, you don’t need to giveaway the product itself - you can even do a giveaway of a gift certificate.

·         network infrastructure.  Wireless technologies (e.g., BT, WLANs, cellular telephony) vary on the degree of bandwidth and reliability they provide.  In this respect one can speak of variable bandwidth .

Another phenomenon also observable in the wireless world is bursty traffic. As Norros and others have found out  (Norros, et al. 1995, 1999, 2000), in Internet-type networks, the traffic pattern is bursty, and this holds in different time scales (so it is "fractal" in a sense). 

·         Variant Tariffs: For some networks (e.g., in cellular telephones), network access is charged per connection-time, while for others (e.g., in packet radio), it is charged per message (packet). In the WAP environment there is a larger variety of tariffs, e.g. session-based, transaction-based, connection time-based while in Mobile E-Commerce the range of tariffs is even wider.

1.1    Device properties

Mobile devices that are of interest to MEC can be divided into four categories based on their processor, memory and battery capacity, application capabilities (SMS, WAP, Web), as well as physical size and weight. These categories are (from  weakest to strongest): usual voice handsets with SMS capability, WAP phones, Communicators/PDA+wireless communication capability, and finally laptops with wireless communication facilities.

To be easily carried around, mobile devices must be physically light and small. Everybody, who has dragged a 3 kg laptop would say that it is not practical for anywhere anytime computing. On the other hand, a usual wireless phone weighing less than 100 g  is easy  to carry but cumbersome to write anything long due to the small multifunction keypad. PDA class is a compromise that has already the WAP and/or Web capabilities. Such considerations, in conjunction with a given cost and level of technology, will keep mobile elements having less resources than static elements. Thus, we can argue for the following invariants in these device classes:

·         The physical size of the device should be such that it can be carried in a pocket and it should not weigh more than 100-200 grams. On the other hand, it should not be too small, because then it becomes impossible to use the keypad and also use the device into voice traffic. Going below 100 g is not necessary. Neither is it possible,  if the battery is expected to last a reasonable time  between recharging  (see below).

·         As a consequence of the above, the optimal portable devices have small screens and small, multifunction keypads;  the former fact necessitates the development of appropriate visual user interfaces, different from the PC or laptop. The visual interfaces can use colours; voice-based  interfaces can be also used in a natural way.   For the latter, the physical size of the device is not so  important, whereas for the former it is. The keypad must have a minimal physical size in order to be usable. Unless clever new technologies are invented to  replace the keypad, it and the screen determine the lower bound for the size of the devices.

·         Portable or embedded devices have less resources than static elements, including memory, disk capacity (usually absent from the three lower classes) and computational power than traditional computing devices. This is, however, only relative. The processor capacity of the current PDAs is at the level of a  PC five years ago, and probably in a few years the 1 GHz clock speed processors will have reached the handsets. With memory the development is similar, because the memory chips also  will contain more bits in the same physical space.  The only problem is that the more speed the processor has, the more energy it tends to consume, because the voltage used in  the circuitry tends to  be higher in fast processors.

·         Portable devices rely for their operation on the finite energy provided by batteries. Even with advances in battery technology, this energy concern will not cease to exist. This is because the conserved energy depends primarily on the weight volume of the battery. Different technologies have in this respect different coefficients,  but the law is the same. Thus, the tendency might be that larger and larger part of the device's weight and volume consists of the battery and smaller part of the circuitry in the future.